How To Get A Custom Made Lengha In Ca

laziness # 1

Warning

The lazy, according to its original definition, means one who pretends , the pretending. The verb pretending ^{until 17 th century} means procrastinate, hesitate, act sluggishly. He combines some laziness, a nimble little temperament to act, undecided about the benefits of delaying action and lazily passing the act, secretly convinced that he will not be worth the trouble he would give. the lazy (who pretends) to lazy (who does nothing) , so there was a lazy language, a laziness that keeps track of the phonetic meaning of illness or moral perversion that we attribute to laziness today: "In idleness there will decided to do nothing; took the lazy the party and chose to become ashamed to live at the expense of others. " [1] The new complaints and through which our postmodern laborious rigged this term may well revive its slow metamorphosis.

.

The laziness that characterizes my work as an employee, means the trend, now widespread in do nothing If necessary grease the wheel that economic and social development which has been contracted to do the role and pretend live (to feign , the current sense of that verb). This trend is that the principle of inertia initialed by the employment contract and requiring the contractor to persist in the social movement of the workforce (or its lack). This is a simple kinetic inertia, contractual, which we can not attach special moral value. But the inactive itself, non-employee, is common to blame his inactivity inertia sclerosis and incontinence are the spiritual principle of the wage, to hold even for very respectable job of inertia employee and instead to strike inactivity of any human indignity. However, do at work, so exciting it is and whatever the resistance opposed to it, sooner or later revert to pretend to do, while the lazy, in the strict sense of the man who does nothing (here non-employee), he can find some pleasure in idleness, lies instead in the impossibility of pretending, and indeed, the need to do.

The laziness I do my party, if it sometimes leads to doing nothing (not to sign any contract of employment or integration, as far as possible ...), means above all the refusal to pretend to live and joined his first definition, attached to the virtues of inaction, while citing the need to do to get to survive in both senses of the word, defined one another: that of sustainable livelihoods, preservation of life and health, and in the second sense of overcoming a life of slavery illusion, delusion, filling fictitious time. Finally it involves a celebration of self, his speech and his ruthless and uncomfortable existence, a celebration enough untied for the collective mood can corrupt in the author, not more than the mirage of an oasis can not bend inward and a cactus, we would give a temperament weeping willow.

"Democracy divides people into workers and idlers. For those who do not have time to work, it is undeveloped. " Karl Kraus.

"Enough of acts, words! " Yves Le Manach.

Despite the special care that the French now surround their inactive, and at the end of egalitarian reforms switched prewar [2] - including the idea that we might have something else to do that work - System has never seemed so little to those who do not have time to work. Whether you come in range of the wage or they can not win, that accesses a pseudo-clandestine prostitution coping with the social, cultural tricks, parallel economies, scams cheap markets of bad luck, begging state or city, which connects the web of social fabric crafts loose or resistant and that takes out a shabby cover or otherwise villainous, no more frustrate hopes for the system excluding any Draft celebration of self and life without also condemning oneself to a form of internal exile. And if an individualist - I mean there anyone famous cruelty of its existence, intends to remain in control and strive for a certain harmony with oneself and the world - had to be described in terms of Karl Kraus the fate in store for him now that system it would be more inclined to state something like: "Could it time to work, they would lose work," or "work is do with work, even if we can ever make it . " trite slogan and apparently lazy as they encourage instead to do nothing, they did not contain the paradox of wage labor, its intrinsic inertia, he invokes spiritual sclerosis, selflessness now so strongly indicated, if required, and the tremendous efforts made to feign aspirations contrary, in a word: its laziness.

ago in the current economic and social optimism frank confession and exalted, even desperate, the inertia of the wage [3] . Incontinence spiritual without which the daily hard would breathe properly had first manifested in full, openly and without pretense, in idle pay. The inactive, non-employees, have invested heavily, without the precarious work and precarious work soon became a seduction lean and low in efficiency to relax. [4] The left liberals, proponents of social support mechanisms, have developed such an amendment guilt they would soon be dealing drastically as bad seed that was only moral consequence of the wage, holding for a cause degeneration of social inertia that was only the effect, or the mere revelation of this effect. He was socially vital in the liberal logic of our priests defrocked, solidarist Republicans, Republicans tired of war, that (the) lazy (e) that (one) that does not alleged - in reality that money more time and sweat against a salary - remains, becomes or again become a (e) pretending (e) as the others, he (she) makes it (it) also seem to live and uses his creativity to this noble task. It was in the presence of a heterogeneous mass and unpredictable, no fixed identity, denying himself a social class, and it was important to constantly re-motivate, the support and individual support as its non-research his research, so that at least, failing again to produce for itself a living, it should cease think, as a myriad of mirrors aware, sterility and the effect of wage labor annihilating. The populist right, then, to complete the social ecosystem by addressing the root this ailment ungrateful moral laziness that sudden and highly contagious, per root, mean right out of the workforce, market goodwill blind and enthusiastic which would be undertaken soon cure the evil (the inertia sterile destructuring) by propagating into the cause (self-forgetfulness respectable). So that the whole wage inactivity, unemployment more or less technical and sustainable Following this principle generous, altruistic, was soon far from work without pay as salaried unemployed. We had turned the mirror on each of its uselessness and the image was striking: it was believed to live in a jungle and we lived in a zoo! The fear of the other perfectly confined to the fear of oneself, there was ample time to give dignity to the highest bidder and we will embrace the inertia respectable (though often miserable), time auction populist election on the basis of a wobbly staggering selfishness of absurdity and inhumanity, which is approached by reversing some expected the word [5] Stevenson put in an epigraph to his apology for idlers :

The lazy (which itself called chosen to live at the expense of others): work engenders boredom.

The worker: If fact, sir, because more and more of us live without working and still claim not least the existence, so that the free life we \u200b\u200black the same time it reaches us in our dignity of being servile. If instead we were all working, we do not experiencing any regret or humiliation, we console each other ...

This dialogue is just depressing the translation into the language of sliced \u200b\u200bhuman consciousness, the current populist speeches, full of laborious values. [6] This partition moral slacker / worker would not find any echo in us without that inner conviction, widely shared, it would in our power to decide in two, and it would even the dignity human right to choose his piece and throw the bad. Some, who are legion, make the forgetfulness of self respect for oneself and others, more rare, consider that this is precisely incontinence spiritual unworthy of man. But whatever its sensitivity, lazy or slothful , gregarious or anti-social, we do not continue less, in most cases, to conduct this dialogue internally and sterilizing idiot, which is irresistibly exchanged roles and arguments, according to his sufferings and frustrations, even after apparently taken a trench face its inability to individual dispense with laziness wage labor. [7]

So we can reasonably attribute this inability our system only. Our entrepreneurs pragmatic ideologues of our land, are also of this inability to switch from individual wage labor an argument must, together with a virtue that no one in reality would be unprepared. And if we feel at first ordered to acquiesce, when we scored the necessary work in our nature, it is that we've already registered ourselves.

(more ...)

Stéphane Prat

Suite and end December 7, 2010

---

[1] Definition dating from 1858, a certain Pierre Lafaye Benjamin, in his Thesaurus of the French Language "(p 829). He heard also distinguish laziness and laziness, the latter having more of a natural human tendency, before the intervention of will.

[2] Paid leave, reduced working time, advances in our welfare as a whole until the present social assistance, egalitarianism in principle, crucible a culture of compensation and leisure, our current cult of collective desire, undoubtedly strengthened the moral strictures of the work they claimed to loosen.

[3] I here denotes the inertia of the wage itself, the mere persistence of contract in social movement work. Work, depending on how economic and social means to persist in the movement of the workforce. I see optimism in the current collective supposed to cure the economic and social immobility, the admission of this helpless inertia and, unexpectedly, its strengthening.

[4] This has been likened to the phenomenon Assistantship loss of identity and boredom suffered by many of us already. (We are late 80's, early 90) I would see for myself, initially at least, a sign of good mental health and the strict observance of human nature which would command instead to do nothing that do not meet subsistence needs. In all cases, there is no reason to assume that the inertia, inactivity, signed by integration contract or of another nature than wage inertia. And evidence to the contrary, that in this "welfare" has quickly emerged as unbearable, socially, collectively, it is this inertia that wage labor, so far, made bearable if not, at least respectable. It rightly else.

[5] "Boswell: Idleness begets ennui.

"Johnson: Yes, indeed, sir, because others are busy, so we are short of company. If instead we were all lazy, we feel no weariness, and we entertain each other. "

[6] can also doubt that this speech is really to put on (the) lazy (e) on the steep path of labor. Through him (her), he would apply rather than those of assets, employees, which has some good reasons to believe, considering how they live riveted to the inertia of the work that they do not adapt very least the inertia of inactivity, as well as inactive acquired values \u200b\u200blaborious, it is feared that they struggle to continue, subject to the imperatives of daily subsistence, to semblance of life.

[7] The will that we put in this voluntary servitude or the resistance opposed to it are now weighing whether to paltry individual destiny, that You can find both the course pretending (mainly driven by a herd sensitivity) among inactive the lazy anti-social in assets. The "lazy person" is obliged then to a much stronger resistance to it too must feign enthusiasm or indignation, play worker, therefore, take note of a certain laziness personal . And if the "lazy inactive becomes obliged docile optimism able to clear his conscience of inactivity no external routine can not deny, is that he can not totally ignore his personal aspirations and his need to make and should indeed recognize themselves, willy-nilly, a certain laziness , even if he (she) denounces selfishness.